SootBean factory · model efficacy · Jul 2026
Every agent — planner, designers, workers, reviewer, QA — on Grok 4.5, building one full-stack phone app from a single prompt. It scored the highest quality we've measured.
Two independent strong judges score the finished app on design, polish, and how well it fulfils the brief. Grok 4.5 is the best result to date.
DeepSeek V4 Flash is our default factory model. Here's the trade Grok 4.5 offers against it.
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | Grok 4.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design score | ~5.2 / 10 | 7.5 / 10 |
| Cost per wave | ~$1 | ~$77 |
| Wall-clock | ~26 min | 46 min |
| Tool discipline | good | 9 errors / 3,072 calls |
| Role in the factory | every agent, by default | every agent, this experiment |
Grok buys roughly +2.3 design points over our flash default. The cost gap is almost entirely cache-read pricing — agent loops resend the whole transcript every call (~134M input tokens), 96% of them cache reads, and Grok prices those far higher than DeepSeek. A smart split (Grok on the quality-setting roles, flash on the rest) is the obvious next test to keep most of the quality at a fraction of the cost.
Prompt: "a phone-first running tracker — choose a run type, enter distance and time, save the run, see today's summary." Grok's factory shipped this, seeded and working on web and native.


